So I’ve been a published E-author for a while now, with two
books released. It’s been an overall positive experience.
I have not yet been published traditionally-going the agent
to big-6 publisher route.
So, from my experiences with both types of publishing, what
have I noticed?
First, E-publishing is easier. I spent a while trying to
get various novels published with a legitimate E-publisher, with some false starts,
but now I’m comfortable. I had to brush up on my writing after some rejections
pointed out flaws, but I made it.
Traditional publishing? Tougher. It’s recommended that
people go through agents first, and not directly to publishers. Agents are the
first gatekeepers to the publishing world, and they are difficult to impress.
No matter how unique you think your premise is, they’ve probably seen something
similar before, and every agent may find something different wrong with your
manuscript.
Keep in mind, though, that my experiences are from writing
as a hobby while working 9-5 (or 8-6 in some cases) every day. If you have
plentiful free time to submit to agents and publishers, you may find that
things move much faster.
Another major difference is how your materials are
submitted. E-publishers take query letters, but will often look at part of or
the entire manuscript, and often give you pointers even if they reject it.
With agents? You have one query letter with which to impress
them. Make it count. Some will let you paste a few pages into the email, but
it’s the query letter that really matters. And your rejections will typically
be standard form rejections, so don’t expect anything helpful. Even rejections
of partial and full manuscripts can take the form of “this is great, but not
for me/this agency.” If two different agents reject something and do give you
feedback, the feedback will often be contradictory. All you can do is keep
trying.
So what about once you do get something out? The major
difference here-and the biggest benefit of E-publishing-is turnaround time.
I’ve heard agents say that if they sold a book tomorrow, it would be published
in two years. E-publishers? 6 months. E-books are a great way to ride a fad,
and if as a reader if you decide you like a certain genre, you can expect more
soon. As an author, you can see your work available on Amazon less than a year
after finishing your book if you edit quickly. E-publishers are often more
willing to take shorter, novella length works, too, expanding an author’s shelf
and providing quick, cheap reads.
So why bother with traditional publishing at all? It’s
harder, slower, and often must create fads rather than fit into them.
The answer is obvious-sales and recognition. E-publishing is
getting there, but for the moment sales can’t compare to a traditionally
published book. On top of that, some genres do better as traditional
books-middle grade kids typically can’t afford E-readers. Plus, most
E-publishers don’t offer advances, so your money will depend entirely on how
well your book does.
Both routes of publishing are valid and can lead to rewards.
But keep the differences in mind when planning your future in writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment